Please do not return this as pdf or Word. Just include it (or the relevant
parts of it) in your email message.

1. Please tell us briefly why you think your manuscript is appropriate for
this journal in particular, taking into account the topics that it covers.

  The three editors are as follows:

  Jon Baron handles manuscripts on individual differences, cognitive style,
  moral judgments and decisions, fairness, allocation, parochialism,
  experimental philosophy, and papers that do not fit in any of the
  categories listed here (which might be forwarded to another editor).

  Mandeep Dhami handles manuscripts related to judgment (including
  forecasting, risk perception and communication, heuristics and biases,
  lens model) as well as manuscripts in applied domains that test theories
  of judgment and decision making, and papers that investigate
  emotion/affect and decision-making as well as decision-making across the
  lifespan.

  Andreas Gloeckner handles manuscripts on basic decision making topics
  such as probabilistic inferences, risky choice, fast-and-frugal
  heuristics, papers on interactive or strategic decision making topics
  (e.g., social dilemmas), coherence-based decision making, as well as
  papers on methodology (including registered reports, eye-tracking,
  artificial intelligence, neuronal networks, theory development).

2. Indicate which editor you would suggest for your submission. You may
indicate a second choice. You don't need to copy everything. Please say why
you chose your first choice, in a few words.

3. Feel free to recommend reviewers, or potential reviewers to avoid. For
each one, provide the name, institution, a description of any relationship
you have with the person (e.g., recent joint projects, advisor or advisee,
"none", etc.), and, if needed, a brief comment about why this person would
be good, or bad. Reviewers provide information, not votes, so do not
hesitate to name people who would agree, or strongly disagree, with your
conclusions, for whatever reason, so long as they are expert on some aspect
of the paper.

4. If your data, data descriptions and/or materials are available online,
please provide the URL (or indicate that it is in the paper itself).

5. If you have pre-registered your hypotheses, please provide the URL:

6. Does your submission conform to the statistical guidelines at
http://journal.sjdm.org/stat.htm ? The most common issues are the use of
multiple regression, statistical control, moderation, mediation, and
interactions.