• Vaz, A., Ingendahl, M., Mata, A., & Alves, H. (2025). “Stop the Count!” – How reporting partial election results fuels beliefs in election fraud. Psychological Science, 36(8), 676-688. [link]
• Dietvorst, B. J. (in press). Understanding people’s preferences for predictions: People prioritize being right over minimizing how wrong they are in expectation, Management Science. [link]
• DeKay, M. L. (in press). Risky-choice framing effects persist when option descriptions are matched and complete: A replication and extension of DeKay and Dou (2024). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. [link]
• Atir S. & Dunning D. A. (in press). Learning more than you can know: Introductory education produces overly expansive self-assessments of knowledge. Management Science. [link]
• Hagmann, D., Sajons, G. B., & Tinsley, C. H. (2025). Base rate neglect as a source of inaccurate statistical discrimination. Management Science. [link]

• Dorison, C. A., & Charlesworth, T. E. S. (2025). What Is Rationality, Whom Is It Ascribed To, and Why Does It Matter? Evidence From Internet Text for 66 Social Groups and 101 Occupations. Psychological Science. [link]
• Pleskac, T. J., Kyung, E. J., Chapman, G. B., & Urminsky, O. (2025), Blinded versus Unblinded Review: A Field Study on the Equity of Peer-Review Processes. Management Science. [link]
• Gaertig, C. & Simmons, J. P. (forthcoming). Why (and When) Are Uncertain Price Promotions More Effective Than Equivalent Sure Discounts? Journal of Consumer Research. [link]
• Heck, P. R., Benjamin, D. J., Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (2025). Overconfidence Persists Despite Years of Accurate, Precise, Public, and Continuous Feedback: Two Studies of Tournament Chess Players. Psychological Science. [link]
• Sun, C., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2025). Prediction that conflicts with judgment: The low absolute likelihood effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. [link]
• Szaszi, B., Goldstein, D. G., Dilip, S., Michie, S. (2025). Generalizability of choice architecture interventions. Nature Reviews Psychology. [link]
• Naborn, J., & Bogard, J. E. (2025). The Pick-the-Winner-Picker Heuristic: Preference for Categorically Correct Forecasts. Journal of Marketing Research. [link]
• Duckworth, A. L. et al. (2025). A national megastudy shows that email nudges to elementary school teachers boost student math achievement, particularly when personalized. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(13), e2418616122. [link]
• Maier, M., Harris, A. J., Kellen, D., & Singmann, H. (2025). Decision making under extinction risk. Cognitive Psychology, 159, 101735. [link]
• Winet, Y., & Davenport, D. (2025). Responsibility Targeting Shapes Collective Moral Judgment. [link]
• Yang, A. X., & Teow, J. (2025). Framing affects postdecision preferences through self-preference inferences (and probably not dissonance). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 154(2), 574–595. [link]

• Morris, A., Carlson, R.W., Kober, H., Crockett, M.J. (2025). Introspective access to value-based multi-attribute choice processes, Nature Communications, 16, 3733. [link]
• Pink, S. L., Cervantez, J., Kirgios, E. L., Chang, E. H., Milkman, K. L. (2025). Can stereotype reactance prompt women to compete? A field experiment, Organization Science. [link]
• Hu, B., Gaertig, C., & Dietvorst, B. J. (2024). How should time estimates be structured to increase customer satisfaction?, Management Science. [link]
• Himmelstein, M., Zhu, S., Petrov, N., Karger, E., Helmer, J., Livnat, S., Bennett, A., Hedley, P., Tetlock, P. (2025). The forecasting proficiency test: A general use assessment of forecasting ability. [link]
• Kirgios, E. L., Silver, I., & Chang, E. H. (2025) Does communicating measurable diversity goals attract or repel historically marginalized job applicants? Evidence from the lab and field, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. [link]
• Mirny, D. J., & Spiller, S. A. (2025) Source memory is more accurate for opinions than for facts, Journal of Consumer Research. [link]

Web page maintained by Dave Hardisty; image by Gaëlle Villejoubert.