Cover for print version
Judgment and Decision MakingThis is the journal of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making (SJDM) and the European Association for Decision Making (EADM). It is open access, published on the World Wide Web, at least every two months. We have no author fees so far.
What we publish (and do not publish)
Submitted articles should be original1 and relevant to the tradition of research in the field represented by SJDM and EADM. Relevant articles deal with normative, descriptive, and/or prescriptive analyses of human judgments and decisions. These include, but are not limited to: experimental studies of judgments of hypothetical scenarios; experimental economic approaches to individual and group behavior; use of physiological methods to understand human judgments and decisions; discussion of normative models such as utility theory; and applications of relevant theory to medicine, law, consumer behavior, business, public choice, and public economics.
Types of articles: We publish short articles, adversarial collaborations, informative replies to articles we have published, meta-analyses, new empirical contributions, and theoretical articles.
Replications: We publish replications, so long as they have a compelling rationale, e.g., the original results were surprising.
Pre-registration: We will also review the Introduction and Method section of proposed studies (plus something like a power analysis, if relevant). If these are accepted, then we promise to publish the results. The idea is to encourage risky but important studies (including replications) by removing the fear that a negative or ambiguous result will not be publishable.
What we do not publish: We do not publish literature reviews unless they feature a theoretical contribution or represent a special point of view. We are not interested in applications of a decision analytic method to particular problems in commerce or other fields. Proposals for special issues will not be accepted for the time being.
Data and materials
We strongly encourage the submission of raw data (with a key to the meaning of variable names, if needed) and stimulus materials at the time of the initial submission and will often request these if they are not already submitted. Publications should, insofar as possible, include all key information necessary to understand (and replicate) the study and data analysis. Feel free to use footnotes, appendices, or supplements.
We include the data of accepted articles with the articles (unless this is for some reason difficult). We will also include stimuli, questionnaires, and code, when these are necessary to understand exactly what was done (again, unless this is difficult for some reason, such as questionnares with copyright restrictions).
Send submissions, comments, or questions by email to the Editor, Jonathan Baron, at email@example.com. A detailed cover letter is not needed; a brief email message is sufficient. If you do not hear anything within 2 days, please try again.
Submissions typically include author information at the beginning, but you can omit that if you wish. A complete submission consists of a pdf version of the paper with page numbers, a text version (text, doc, docx, or tex), supplements (if any), and data. Do not send figures separately.
Make sure that the details of your method (if any) are clear. You can use supplements for this if necessary. Send the data with your submission if possible. If the paper is published you will have to submit them eventually.
Submission format: Please send pdf, and either doc, docx, or tex files. We recommend our Overleaf template to make both tex and pdf. Make sure to include page numbers and no line numbers.
Submitted articles should be readable. Reviewers prefer tables, figures, and footnotes in the text, not at the end.
Accepted articles should meet these technical requirements. If you plan to submit an article, it helps to look at the technical requirements before you finish writing it.
Submitted articles are screened by the Editor and possibly by an Associate Editor before they are sent for review. This screening may involve checking the data. This process is designed to insure speedy rejection when rejection seems warranted.
Articles that seriously violate the statistical guidelines may be sent back for revision before review.
Usually the review will involve one Consulting Editor and another reviewer. Informative reviews from earlier submissions of the same paper (with authors' responses to them) may reduce the number of required reviewers.
EditorJonathan Baron, University of Pennsylvania
Associate EditorsMaya Bar-Hillel, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Edward Cokely, University of Oklahoma
Michael DeKay, Ohio State University
Enrique Fatas, University of East Anglia Joseph G. Johnson, Miami University of Ohio
Michael Lee, University of California, Irvine
Barbara Mellers, University of Pennsylvania
Leif Nelson, University of California, Berkeley
Ilana Ritov, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Will Skylark, University of Cambridge
Consulting EditorsHal Arkes, Ohio State University
Netta Barak-Corren, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Nicolao Bonini, University of Trento
Arndt Bröder, Universität Mannheim
Clintin Davis-Stober, University of Missouri
Mandeep Dhami, University of Surrey
Paul Dolan, London School of Economics and Political Science
Catherine Eckel, Texas A&M University
Kimmo Eriksson, Stockholm University
Ido Erev, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology
Gregory Fischer, Duke University
Craig Fox, University of California, Los Angeles
Shane Frederick, Yale University
Andrew Gelman, Columbia University
Thomas Gilovich, Cornell University
Daniel Goldstein, Microsoft Research
Ulrich Hoffrage, University of Lausanne
Konstantinos Katsikopoulos, University of Southampton and Harding Centre for Risk Literacy
Simon Kemp, University of Canterbury, N.Z.
Gideon Keren, Tilburg University
Kris Kirby, Williams College
Derek Koehler, University of Waterloo
Jonathan Jay Koehler, Northwestern University
David H. Krantz, Columbia University
Irwin Levin, University of Iowa
Shu Li, Chinese Academy of Sciences Don Moore, University of California, Berkeley
Jeryl Mumpower, Texas A & M University
Ben Newell, University of New South Wales
Lisa Ordóñez, University of Arizona
Ellen Peters, Ohio State University
Antonio Rangel, California Institute of Technology
Alan Schwartz, University of Illinois at Chicago
Barry Schwartz, Swarthmore College
Cass Sunstein, Harvard Law School
Peter Ubel, Duke University
Eldad Yechiam, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology
Liane Young, Boston College
Supervisory committeeDerek Koehler, University of Waterloo (SJDM)
Ellen Peters, Ohio State University (SJDM)
Tim Pleskac, Max Planck Institute for Human Development (EADM)
Michel Handgraaf, Wageningen UR (EADM)
1An article cannot be previously published in a refereed journal. It can, however, be published in a conference proceedings, a personal web site, or a working-paper series.
Web page maintained by Jonathan Baron; image by Gaëlle Villejoubert; additional software by Adam Kramer, Alan Schwartz, and Xiaohua Du. Main site hosted by the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania.